Supreme Court Turns Down Giants' Bid to Dismiss Harassment Suit
Upheld 9th Circuit ruling that jurisdiction existed to hear case in San Francisco
The issue was not the merits of the suit (still undecided), but the power of the lower federal court where the suit was first brought. The players filed suit in both the Dominican Republic in June 1997 and in the Federal court in San Francisco in April 1998. The judge dismissed the case on grounds of non forum conveniens, declaring that the Dominican Republic was a more appropriate forum for the case.
However, the 9th District Court of Appeals reinstated the lawsuit in May 2000.
Their ruling in Monegro v. Rosa concluded that the city of San Francisco had a
"substantial relation" to the action, conferring personal jurisdiction. Although
the player contracts provided that all would play for the San Pedro Giants in the
Dominican Republic, there were addenda for transfers to minor or major league teams in the
U.S. The 9th District ruling determined that playing for the Giants or some other U.S.
team was the plaintiffs' common goal.
Furthermore, it was uncertain if Rosa, a U.S. citizen, could be forced to appear in court in the Dominican Republic. There was no demonstration that access to proof would be easier in that country than in the U.S.; all of the Giants' employment records are located in San Francisco.
Amy Armond
Home | Introduction
| Current Articles | Archived
Articles | Sportslaw History |
Sportslaw Jargon | Mark's Bio
| Letters to Editor | Register
| Search the Site
Mark's Sportslaw News © 2000 Mark Conrad. All Rights Reserved. For more information and comments on this article and other sports law issues, send e-mail to: mail@sportslawnews.com.