Nike Admits Tiger Woods' Golf Balls Are Unavailable to the Public
In suit claiming unfair business practices, company states that alterations are 'minor'
San Francisco, August 27, 2000 -- Nike has done it again.
After being sued in U.S. District Court in San Francisco, Nike acknowledged that
the golf balls which Tiger Woods uses in professional competition are not available to the
public. A nonprofit group, Public Remedies, filed a claim alleging that Nike is engaging
in unfair business practices. At issue is the fact that Woods plays with "custom made
balls unavailable" to consumers, rather than the "Nike Tour Accuracy" golf
balls which Woods endorses in print and television advertisements. Additionally,
Public Remedies is calling for Nike's "ill gotten gains be restored to the
public", according to the Associated Press.
In response to the lawsuit, a Nike spokesperson admitted that that the balls which Woods
uses in competition have a "slightly harder inner and outer core than the balls sold
to the public." Nike, however, also contends that it is commonplace for manufactures
to make minor specification adjustments to the equipment which professionals use in
competition. This notion is disputed by other golf equipment manufactures, such as
Titleist and Callaway, who claim that the public is offered the same equipment that their
professionals endorse, provided that the consumer may have to wait only for the equipment
to be mass produced.
While Woods officially switched to the Nike ball before the U.S. Open this year,
he claims that he can see no "appreciable difference" in the distance between
the Nike ball and the Titleist ball, which he used previously, and which is available to
the public, according to ESPNews.
Only days after this lawsuit was filed, Nike announced that the exact ball which Woods
uses in competition would soon become available to the public, pending U.S. Golf
Association approval, and be marketed as "Tour Accuracy TW". It is a decision
which Nike maintains had been in the works long before the suit against them was filed.
Nike also stated that the company would continue to defend against the pending lawsuit.
Andrew
Goodman
Home | Introduction
| Current Articles | Archived
Articles | Sportslaw History |
Sportslaw Jargon | Mark's Bio
| Letters to Editor | Register
| Search the Site
Mark's Sportslaw News © 2000 Mark Conrad. All Rights Reserved. For more information and comments on this article and other sports law issues, send e-mail to: mail@sportslawnews.com.